Service of process isn’t just a formality—it’s a legal requirement that ensures a defendant has a fair chance to respond to a lawsuit.
If service isn’t done correctly, the entire case can crumble before it even starts.
So, what happens when a court finds service to be insufficient?
Here’s the fallout—and why it matters.
1. The Court Can Dismiss the Case
The most immediate consequence? The case gets thrown out.
- If service is legally defective, the court may dismiss the case entirely.
- Dismissal can be with prejudice (you can’t refile) or without prejudice (you can try again).
- If the statute of limitations has expired, dismissal may mean you lose the right to sue forever.
Example:
A plaintiff sues for breach of contract but fails to serve the defendant within the court’s deadline.
The defendant challenges service and wins—the case is dismissed.
Since the statute of limitations has expired, the plaintiff loses the right to refile.
Bad service can permanently kill a case.
2. The Plaintiff Has to Start Over (More Time, More Money)
Even if the case isn’t dismissed, improper service forces the plaintiff to go back to square one.
- The plaintiff must redo service of process, which costs time and money.
- The lawsuit is delayed while service is attempted again.
- If service keeps failing, the case may never move forward.
Example:
A process server leaves legal documents with a random neighbor instead of the defendant.
The defendant challenges service, and the court rules it invalid.
The plaintiff has to hire a new process server and attempt service again—delaying the case by months.
Bad service slows down justice—and costs more money.
3. A Default Judgment Can Be Overturned
If service was defective, any default judgment against the defendant can be vacated (set aside).
- Defendants who missed court because they were never properly served can challenge the judgment.
- A court can erase the default ruling and force the plaintiff to start over.
Example:
A debt collector wins a default judgment against a defendant who was never properly served.
The defendant files a Motion to Vacate, arguing improper service.
The court throws out the judgment, forcing the creditor to start over.
Improper service = a weak judgment that can be undone.
4. The Plaintiff Can Be Forced to Pay Sanctions & Fees
If a plaintiff knowingly uses bad service, they can face financial penalties.
- Courts can order the plaintiff to pay legal fees for forcing the defendant to challenge improper service.
- If service was done fraudulently or in bad faith, the court may issue sanctions.
Example:
A landlord fakes a process server’s affidavit to rush an eviction lawsuit.
The tenant proves service never actually happened.
The judge dismisses the case and fines the landlord for abusing the legal process.
Trying to cut corners in service of process can backfire—hard.
5. The Defendant Gains a Legal Advantage
Bad service gives the defendant an upper hand—because now they can fight the case on a procedural technicality.
- The defendant buys more time, forcing the plaintiff to restart the process.
- If the case is weak, the defendant can use improper service as leverage to get it dismissed.
- A dismissal can intimidate the plaintiff into dropping the lawsuit entirely.
Example:
A company sues a former employee for violating a non-compete agreement but fails to serve them properly.
The employee’s lawyer challenges the case on technical grounds and gets it dismissed.
The company loses its leverage, and the employee keeps working for the competitor.
A defendant with legal knowledge can use bad service to escape a lawsuit.
6. Delayed Justice for the Plaintiff
If service of process is faulty, the legal process stalls—sometimes indefinitely.
- The longer a case drags on, the harder it is to win.
- Key witnesses disappear, evidence is lost, and legal costs pile up.
- The defendant might move, hide assets, or take actions that make recovery more difficult.
Example:
A plaintiff sues for personal injury but delays proper service for over a year.
Witnesses forget key details, and medical records become harder to obtain.
The case loses strength, and the plaintiff struggles to prove damages.
Bad service doesn’t just hurt the defendant—it weakens the plaintiff’s case.
How to Avoid Insufficient Service of Process
- Follow your state’s service rules exactly—no shortcuts.
- Use a licensed process server (don’t serve papers yourself).
- Verify that the defendant was actually served—not a random person.
- Double-check that all legal documents were delivered properly.
- File proof of service with the court immediately.
- If service fails multiple times, request alternative service through the court.
Pro Tip:
If a defendant is dodging service, you can ask the court for alternative methods (certified mail, email, or publication).
Final Takeaway
- Service of process must be done correctly—or the entire case is at risk.
- Defective service can lead to dismissal, delays, overturned judgments, and financial penalties.
- Hiring a professional process server is the best way to ensure service is legally valid.
Because when it comes to lawsuits, the strongest cases are the ones that actually get served.
Testimonials from Our Clients
What Clients Say About Our People-First Approach
Take the Next Step with The Process Server
Connect with us and let our experts help you tackle any legal challenge effortlessly. Start your journey to effective solutions today. Your legal concerns are our priority.
"*" indicates required fields
Ready to Talk?
Journey with The Process Server (TPS) and experience the simplicity and comprehensiveness of expert legal support by TPS.
We're here to assist you with any legal support services you may require.
We're here to assist you with any legal support services you may require. Although our main office is located in Phoenix, we have dedicated local teams to handle all location-specific tasks efficiently. Here's how you can get in touch with us.
The Process Server
13416 North 32nd Street #110F, Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
Phone: +1 (602) 675-2333
Email: [email protected]
For further details, please refer to the Justice Courts Case Search.